The article from Medium titled "Dear Leftist Critics of Veganism: Veganism Is Not Ableist or Classist" addresses common criticisms against veganism from a Leftist perspective, particularly the notion that veganism is inaccessible, ableist, or classist.
Main Criticism:
Leftists often argue that veganism is ableist and classist because it might exclude individuals with disabilities, those living in poverty, or those without access to necessary resources. They suggest that veganism is a privilege not accessible to everyone.
Veganism vs. Plant-Based Diet:
The article distinguishes between a plant-based diet (focused on food choices) and veganism (a broader ethical stance against exploiting animals for any purpose). This distinction is important as veganism encompasses more than just dietary changes, extending to clothing, entertainment, and more.
Flexibility and Inclusivity:
The definition of veganism by The Vegan Society includes the phrase “as far as is possible and practicable,” indicating that veganism is flexible and recognizes individual circumstances. This means that if someone cannot fully adhere to a vegan lifestyle due to legitimate constraints, they are not excluded from the movement.
Historical Context:
Since its inception, veganism has welcomed anyone who strives towards the ideal of minimizing harm to animals, acknowledging personal limitations. This inclusivity is rooted in the movement's history and definitions.
Practical Realities:
The "desert island" scenario is often used to challenge vegans by presenting extreme survival situations. The article argues that in such scenarios, consuming animal products might be morally excusable. Similarly, real-life constraints such as disabilities or economic barriers are recognized as legitimate reasons why some might not fully adhere to a vegan diet.
Interconnection with Other Oppressions:
The article points out that many Leftist vegans see the fight against human oppression (classism, racism, ableism) as interconnected with the fight against animal oppression. They argue that dismantling capitalism, which exacerbates both human and animal exploitation, is crucial.
Ethical Principle:
The ethical principle of “ought implies can” is emphasized, meaning that individuals are only ethically obligated to do what they are capable of doing. This principle supports the idea that veganism should be pursued to the extent possible for each individual’s circumstances.
The article concludes that the criticism of veganism as inherently ableist and classist is a misinterpretation. Veganism, by its nature and definition, is meant to be inclusive and adaptable to individual capabilities and circumstances. The movement recognizes that not everyone can fully adhere to vegan principles due to various legitimate constraints, but encourages everyone to minimize harm to animals as much as possible within their means.
Read the full article on medium.com